Email notification to Brandon Starr's blog has been shown to reduce bad cholesterol in two-toed sloths, and has been used as an effective exfoliant.
Sunday, April 25, 2004
Why don't our soldiers have the equipment they need?
Elmo says, "count the murders with me. One, two, three..."
Saturday, April 24, 2004
Photomosaic: "War President"
I agree with the artist's statement: most of what you feel about the picture comes from how you feel about Iraq.
But why am I linking to it?
Because the Presidential Administration has been trying to keep the pictures of the soldiers, in any form, from us. They were even upset at The release of pictures of flag-draped coffins
. Why the paranoia?
It's another form of government-as-babysitter. They think we can't handle the truth in any form.
Support the troops. But remember them, too, when they are killed.
Friday, April 23, 2004
Vatican: no fake cannibalism for the rational
Vatican: Communion denied to pro-abortion politicians
This of course affects Democratic Presidential candidate John F. Kerry who, like the other JFK, is Catholic.
Funny how the totalitarian ruler of a theocratic city-state can make a simple thing like the ritual eating of the flesh of a 2,000-year-dead man something odd and divisive.
He'll be gone soon, but it won't help. He'll be replaced by another one just as psycho.
If any of this gets your blood pressure up, relax. Enjoy this picture of a puppy
He's cute. And he's smarter than the Pope. How so? He knows reality when he sees it. No fake-o ghosts, bizarre vows of chastity, or pretend prayer for him. Just good food, rolling in the grass, and enjoying the company of those he loves.
Of course, the Pope could choose to be much smarter than a simple puppy. But, sadly, he uses the amazing powers of his human brain to twist reality inside out for himself and millions of people around the world.
So the puppy is better for the world, too. Any chance he can be ordained when JP II goes?
Thursday, April 22, 2004
Come, retire in Florida. Relax.
Wednesday, April 21, 2004
Kerry to post military record on web site
20 schoolkids killed in Iraq bombings
Coordinated attacks kill 68 Iraqis, including 20 kids
I'm not saying the Iraqi people are bad. I know they're in a horrible situation.
All I know is, no matter how bad the economy is, whether riots were breaking out, or how bad a neighborhood the kid-killings happened in--no matter the situation, if it happened in the U.S., moms and dads in the area would COMB THAT NEIGHBORHOOD until they caught the murderers who were hiding amongst them, and tear them apart.
The pieces would then be sent to the appropriate authorities.*
I can almost understand them trying to kill US.** We're outsiders, we're different, some have died at our hands, our soldiers are apart from them (see my earlier post about my cousin in Iraq
). But allowing bombers killing IRAQIS to live among them? It should be intolerable.
In fact, forget the dads. It's a horribly chauvinistic society. But where are the concerned moms?
* Of course, they should skip the tearing-them-apart step. But I doubt they would.
** Almost. If they'd think rationally, they'd realize all they have to do is set up a democratic republic, and gently shove us out the door. Then they could set up whatever crappy Islamist state they wanted. Instead, they're letting killers roam among them.
Well, it's not that I think I was wrong a few days ago on silver. But in fact, silver is being pulled down heavily. And it's being pulled more than the recent moderate strengthening of the dollar would suggest.
But I will say that the "official yakking" about the silver market has to do with exactly that. The Fed may move sooner than expected. Interest rates up means stronger dollar; stronger dollar means weaker gold and silver. Thus, gold and silver go down.
Trouble is, silver is down from the mid-$8 range to the mid-$6 range. That's about a 25% drop. Gold is down about 8%.
So I still think someone's trying hard to push silver down harder than market forces alone would dictate. But even I'll stipulate that a stronger dollar implies a SOMEWHAT weaker silver market.
But not, I think, quite this weak.
For now, I've gotten out of the way. Yep, out of silver, out of gold. But I'm looking for a chance to get back in. Especially into silver, because 1) the industrial-use-versus-mining gap is larger, and 2) central banks don't own thousands of tons they may dump onto the market, as they do for gold.*
So, there you go. Short term, look out below for gold and silver. But longer term? I still say, watch your head on the way through the ceiling--at some point.
It's when that I have no freakin' idea about.
* Note that most of the big countries have an agreement limiting the number of tons of gold they will sell each year--but it just went up again.
Tuesday, April 20, 2004
Science wins a round in battle for Kennewick Man
Scientists win a round in effort to study Kennewick Man remains
If you don't live in the Pacific Northwest, you may have missed the earlier bits of this story.
Basically, a largely-complete skeleton of a man 9,300 years old was found. Local Native Americans tried to get the bones reburied, unstudied, under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. Scientists raised a cry: even if the bones don't end up in a museum permanently, at least let us do a thorough study, they argued.
The Native Americans disagreed. And the court case began.
I, as you probably can guess, side with the rational. That is to say, the scientists.
Firstly, the remains have serious scientific significance. The remains are far older than any others found anywhere in the area. This alone should be enough for at least a temporary stay while science gives the bones the once-over.
Secondly, there is serious doubt whether the local tribe members are the ancestors of Kennewick Man. 9,300 years is a lot of time, and many tribes made serious migrations over that period. Anthropologists say that all Native Americans stem from folks who made the journey from modern Russia to modern Alaska during a cold period that formed an ice bridge. They then spread over the Americas, from Canada to Chile. But perhaps more importantly, the remains show, intruiguingly, Caucasian features. Some point to the Ainu people of northern Japan, who also have some Caucasian features, as a possible ancestral link. In any event, Kennewick Man may or may not be ancestral to either local Native Americans or perhaps any Native Americans. The story needs to be unfurled. The tribes simply clam up on this point and "declare" that the remains are their ancestors.
Thirdly, the Act makes it difficult for tribes to claim remains over 500 years old. There is a gray area beyond which remains cease to be great-grandparents and simply become archaelogical in nature. Makes sense to me. And the fact that Kennewick Man is 8,700 years beyond the gray area says it all for me.
Native American religious hocus-pocus is just as irrational, bogus, and potentially harmful as any other religion. I say, study Kennewick Man, learn from him. To bury him as a local tribesman is to create an almost-certain lie, and to hide much other truth.
Monday, April 19, 2004
Bush bemoans Spanish pullout from Iraq
Bush: will give "false comfort to terrorists"
That is, of course, pure spin. There's nothing false about the comfort Spain gave the terrorists by their abrupt pullout. It's pure, unadulterated, Sealy Posturepedic comfort, with pillow top.
But it's worse. The Socialist election win, coupled with the high-profile promises to get out of Iraq, guaranteed they'd have to pull out. But it didn't guarantee they'd have to pull out so quickly. How quickly? Bush and company have been left begging for at least a little delay to avoid gaps in security.
Pretty pathetic on Spain's part. And dangerous to the soldiers who remain. Thanks, "partner."
Things aren't looking good, folks. If there are any Iraqis, beyond the lap dogs in the Governing Council, who truly desire peace and democracy, they're going to have to stand up and be counted soon. The window of opportunity is rapidly approaching closure.
Only the terrorists, the thugs, and the fanatics are voicing their opinions, with protests and with guns. If it is possible for a budding Gandhi, Mandela, or Washington to lead the Iraqis towards democracy, the time to begin is now. It's true, there isn't much recent history of freedom and democracy in Iraq--but there is a long history of relative secularism and education. And there wasn't much democracy in India, South Africa, or the States before those three great leaders came along.
Freedom must be earned. Only part of the cost can be borne by outsiders. A large part must be paid by those who desire it--desire it so deeply that they will risk the wrath of the jihadists, the Saddam sympathizers, and the wanna-be totalitarians. It only takes a small part of the population to be willing to pay the price.
Will Iraqis pony up?