Brandon Starr's blog. Updated daily since March 2003. Welcome. Make yourself comfortable. Have a hot chocolate.

Brandon Starr's blog is not to be taken internally. All humor is intentional, unless indicated otherwise.
Do not read while operating heavy machinery. May cause intracranial short circuiting.
Not for children under four days of age.

If for some reason you wish to contact Brandon Starr, take a moment and reconsider.
No? Ah, well. His email is brandonstarr@yahoo.com.
It's your fault now, and don't blame me when it all goes terribly, terribly wrong.


New fiction story! Click here for "The Voice of Cassandra."

Click here for my ongoing novel: "The History of Magic in the 21st Century."

Click here for the lowdown on "The History of Magic"

Click here for my new investing blog, "Adroit Investor"

Click here for my anti-Bush shirts.

Click here for my favorite design: the 'tourist safety shirt.'

Brandon Starr is available in small, medium, and large. Contents may settle during shipping. Allow four to six weeks for delivery. Open carefully; contents under pressure. Do not incinerate. May be habit-forming--do not take if you are gassy or under the influence of mimosas. Improved; now non-staining. Ships in all colors, except puce. Prompt refund if not satisfied--simply return unused portion. All queries promptly ignored. Complaints resolved with deep, gut-blasting laughter, followed by posting complaints on nearest public wall. Not responsible for sunburns. All your base are belong to us. Act now. Beware cheap imitations. Insist on the original--Brandon Starr.

Update notification by email available below.

Some fun/useful/useless links:

The Internet Movie Database

My cousin back from Iraq, and how it changed me (my current favorite entry on this blog)

Zazzle.com

My Zazzle.com product page

Fun blogs:

infinitus opinio

Siren's Song

the mechanical jive

The Strange World

Thunderstorms in the Imajica

Librarianguish

Elven Sarah

Random Musings (Catcher)

Certifiable Princess (Sarah 2)
   

<< September 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30

Email notification to Brandon Starr's blog has been shown to reduce bad cholesterol in two-toed sloths, and has been used as an effective exfoliant.

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed



Friday, September 17, 2004
Kryptonite's kryptonite? Bic.

"Super-strong" Kryptonite bike locks can be opened by sticking in the non-writing end of a Bic pen and twisting.

Oops.  That's a problem.  For Kryptonite, that ranks right up there with "Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction and has ties to al-Qaeda."

Hey, your bike may be gone, but your bike lock will still be there.

Kryptonite is rushing out a new lock design.  No word yet on whether current owners will receive the new lock for free or some sort of discount.

The really bad part is, the BBC did a report on this problem in 1992, and it was never fixed!  Is the CEO of Kryptonite a member of the Bush Administration or something?


Posted at 03:55 pm by brandonstarr
Your thoughts?  

California teachers lose tax breaks for school supplies

California teachers lose tax breaks for school supplies
Teachers across our country have long spent money out of their pocket for school supplies that aren't supplied by the schools.  Sad, but true.

Teachers in poor schools do so even more.

Now California teachers are losing a tax break that helped them defray those costs.

Hmm.

Posted at 08:17 am by brandonstarr
Your thoughts?  

Thursday, September 16, 2004
Only 6 percent of Iraq reconstruction money...

...that Congress approved last year has been spent.

The article I linked to on MSNBC focuses on an intelligence paper downbeat on Iraq.  At first I thought it was the big news, but it was based on intel from a few months before the war.  Still, it's interesting that the intel from that particular era could be so downbeat, even pessimistic, while Bush was thinking that he'd have our soldiers stroll into Baghdad and everyone would be grateful.

But to me the 6 percent is the real story.  Why?  Because it means that almost no progress has been made in Iraq.  If the money could be spent on public works projects, it would be, but there are too many dangers, and too much insurgency, for that to happen.  So bombs go off, and new buildings do not go up.  So the Iraqi people are not seeing their society being put back together--far from it.

So much for all the BS about Iraqi new schools and so forth the Bush Administration has tried to put out there.

Posted at 07:36 am by brandonstarr
Your thoughts?  

Kerry goes after Bush's record

Kerry goes after Bush's record
He's been saying Bush has been trying to avoid his record as President.  And he is.  I would, too, if it were as bad as Bush's.

Finally, a strong move.  Well-timed, too.  This election should be about the issues, and a big one in any race with an incumbent is "how did the incumbent do?"  This should stick, because it will resonate.  And it contrasts nicely with all the BS swift-boat lies and so on.  As bad as Bush's Vietnam-era record was, it was thirty years ago.  Bush's Presidential record is affecting us all today, right now.

Let's roll.

Posted at 07:22 am by brandonstarr
Your thoughts?  

Wednesday, September 15, 2004
Family "thanks" Bush for death of son

Family "thanks" Bush for death of son (WKYC, found via truthout.org)

In much happier news, rational people (i.e. not Bushies) associated with the government are still making breakthroughs:

Physicists make atomic clock the size of a sugar cube, won't lose or gain 1 second in 300 years

In the article, they say they can't even determine what will be the most important applications of this techology yet.  I believe it.  Of course, I believe that in most cases new technology leads to applications not dreamt of by the original inventors.

They made the breakthrough in association with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.  It takes a while for the kind of irrationalist poison given off by a "leader" like Bush to filter down and destroy those whose lives are dedicated to further discoveries of reality.

Another four years ought to do it.


Posted at 07:59 am by brandonstarr
Your thoughts?  

Tuesday, September 14, 2004
59 killed....

...in Iraq fighting, including 11 police officers and many lined up to apply to become police officers.

Crowds near the blast denounce U.S. forces and the Iraqi "government" for continued failure to protect police sites.

Separately, an oil pipeline junction was attacked and set afire north of Baghdad.

Oil has been creeping back upward the last couple of days.  The main reason:  hurricane Ivan's march towards the Gulf Coast and therefore the bulk of U.S. oil production.  Today's second reason was the Iraqi pipeline attack.

Again, though this article doesn't go into it:  world oil useage has crept up over time.  Now it's very near what the world is able to produce regardless of oil quotas in OPEC, etc.  Any hiccup in production means oil prices go up.  The craziness caused by Bush's war ensures lots of hiccups in production.  Add that to the other worldwide hiccups that come up, and oil prices have a tough time going down.  My feeling is that they simply won't go down--not down to the high-$20s where they were before Bush's war.  If we're lucky and things settle down a bit in Iraq and other worldwide factors don't come into play, we may see the mid-$30s again.  But I wouldn't count on that either.  (Full disclosure:  I currently hold a bullish position in ExxonMobil, largely because of my belief that oil prices won't fall soon or far.)

I still think it's hilarious that the press gives any coverage to Bush's lip service on alternative fuels.

Posted at 05:52 pm by brandonstarr
Your thoughts?  

Monday, September 13, 2004
Mixed emotions

The Republican-held Congress allowed the assault weapons ban to lapse.

I'm having mixed feelings on this one.  I am a believer in freedom, and I think most folks allow secondary issues to cloud the gun control arena.  Most believe gun control is about crime or hunting or protection from criminals.  It isn't.  As the founding fathers set it down, it is about forming a last line of defense against the government should it turn dictatorial.  An unarmed society is a society ripe for taking over by anyone who can control the army.  Just ask any of the citizens of the Central American banana republics.

However, while even quite powerful assault weapons are a boon in the hands of reponsible citizens, they are quite dangerous in criminal hands.  So there needs to be some assurance that these guns are kept away from the criminal element.  This is the true balance that needs to be struck.

I don't think simply letting the assault weapon ban lapse is the best move.  And I don't like the way the Republicans just let the ban lapse overnight, and without debate.  It smacks of some of their dirtier legislative tactics of recent years, such as holding the votes open while they strong-arm Congressmen until they get the numbers they need, or holding votes at 3 AM when no one will see them voting.

So, while powerful weapons in the hands of the responsible are fine, the question is how will we keep them from the criminals?  While I think the assault weapons ban went too far in keeping regular folks away from guns, it must be said it did a fair job making assault weapons hard for most criminals to get a hold of--except the most desperate or well-connected.  With the lapse of this law, we have a legal vacuum with nothing else being put in place.

This I don't like.

Posted at 01:16 pm by brandonstarr
Your thoughts?  

Sunday, September 12, 2004
Movement afoot to impeach Tony Blair

Conservative MPs start movement to impeach Blair
The impeachment power hasn't been used in Britain since 1806.

Blair's supporters are going with multiple defenses--rather GOP-style if you ask me.  First, they say that Blair has been exonerated by previous investigations.  (I don't know how thorough they were or by whom, but they may well have been by Blair-friendly folks.)  Second, they say it's a no-hoper--in other words, there just won't be the votes there for impeachment.  This makes sense; Parliament puts the Prime Minister in place, thus the PM always has a majority in Parliament to back him up.  It's also why Congress doesn't move to impeach Bush--though the majority control by the GOP are not related here in the U.S.  Third, they say it's obsolete because it hasn't been used in so long.  I say that's bunk--just because a law hasn't been used in a long time doesn't mean it's gone.

In any event, it's an interesting turn of events in our strongest ally in the so-called "coalition of the willing."

Oh, yeah, and news from our second-strongest ally in the S-C"COTW": Australian leaders are also sparring over Iraq.

Both stories from the BBC.

Posted at 12:05 pm by brandonstarr
Your thoughts?  

Saturday, September 11, 2004
Ivan bears down on Florida

It's looking almost certain now Ivan will raze the west coast of Florida
Three hurricanes in a month.  No power, and high heat.  Yeah, I'm glad I don't live in Florida.

I remember the one time I vacationed there, a storm passed through.  The rain came down in sheets.  I don't think I've been through rain anywhere else that hard.  And I've lived in the Pacific Northwest for a long time now.*

Between living under a second Bush, the heat, and the hurricanes, I don't think I would want to live there.  Beautiful state, though, at least when a hurricane hasn't been through.

* We usually get gentle rain, almost a mist, but we get our share of genuine rain storms too.

Posted at 08:17 pm by brandonstarr
Your thoughts?  

Friday, September 10, 2004
Attack dog bites own *ss

Cheney embarrassed by his own words, backs off on threat that terrorist attacks will happen more if Kerry elected (AP)

Cheney's role in the Bush campaign is to say the ugly, nasty things so that Bush can look "Presidential."  Or, at least, as Presidential as Bush can look.

Cheney said:

"It's absolutely essential that eight weeks from today, on Nov. 2, we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice then the danger is that we'll get hit again and we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States."

In other words, vote Republican or else.  Of course, we know that Bush in his incompetence had 9/11 happen on HIS watch, while Clinton thwarted a millenium bomb threat and a multiple-hijacking threat.  This despite the facts that 1) Clinton during the handover let Bush know that terrorism would be his number-one priority (or should be), 2) he got a briefing saying that bin Laden was trying to attack the United States and that hijackings would be part of that attack.  Despite this, Bush never had a major counterterrorist meeting between the briefing and 9/11, and the Bush Administration CUT antiterrorist intelligence funding.

Today Cheney backed off his statement, lying by saying,

"I did not say if Kerry is elected, we will be hit by a terrorist attack," Cheney told the newspaper. "Whoever is elected president has to anticipate more attacks.

"My point was the question before us is: Will we have the most effective policy in place to deal with that threat? George Bush will pursue a more effective policy than John Kerry,"


So who puts us in more ACTUAL danger by being in power?  I say it's the incompetent.  And we all know who that is.




Posted at 12:59 pm by brandonstarr
Your thoughts?  

Next Page